翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Consumer Rights Act 2015 ・ Consumer Rights Commission of Pakistan ・ Consumer Rights Directive ・ Consumer service ・ Consumer socialization ・ Consumer sovereignty ・ Consumer spending ・ Consumer support estimate ・ Consumer surplus for software products ・ Consumer Ultra-Low Voltage ・ Consumer unit ・ Consumer unit (economics) ・ Consumer Watchdog ・ Consumer watchdog ・ Consumer Watchdog (Botswana) ・ Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ・ Consumer's risk ・ Consumer, Health and Food Executive Agency ・ Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales ・ Consumer-driven health care ・ Consumer-generated advertising ・ Consumer-resource systems ・ Consumer-to-business ・ ConsumerAffairs ・ Consumerclub.com ・ Consumerism ・ Consumerist ・ Consumerization ・ ConsumerLab.com ・ Consumers Cigar Box Company Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ： ウィキペディア英語版 Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ''Consumer Watchdog vs. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation'' is a case focusing on an appeal filed by Consumer Watchdog (CW) to invalidate a patent held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) regarding the in vitro cell culture of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). This case is still currently ongoing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and is the latest in a series of attempts by CW to revoke one of the three patents held by WARF on hESCs. ==Background== On January 20, 1995, James Thomson filed an initial application for patent rights based on his pioneering work in isolating and maintaining long-lived culture of primate and human embryonic stem cells.〔Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, Durning M, Harris CP, Becker RA, Hearn JP. “Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995; 92:7844–7848.〕〔Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. “Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.” Science. 1998; 282:1145–1147.〕 As a result of this filing, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) eventually issued three patents to Thomson, which were all later assigned to WARF: U.S. Patents Nos. 5,843,780 (December 1, 1998),〔Thomson, JA. “Primate Embryonic Stem Cells.” U.S. Patent 5,843,780. 1 December 1998.〕 6,200,806 (March 13, 2001),〔Thomson, JA. “Primate Embryonic Stem Cells.” U.S. Patent 6,200,806. 13 March 2001.〕 and 7,029,913 (April 18, 2006).〔Thomson, JA. “Primate Embryonic Stem Cells.” U.S. Patent 7,029,913. 18 April 2006.〕 These patents are commonly referred to as the ‘780, ‘806, and ‘913 patents, respectively, and are all entitled “Primate Embryonic Stem Cells.” 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.